How U.S. Strategy Failed—and Ceded the Advantage to China
Zack Cooper | Foreign Affairs, March/April 2026
The concept of Asia After America reflects growing concern that U.S. strategic missteps have weakened its position in the Indo-Pacific. In this article, Zack Cooper argues that American policy inconsistencies, shifting priorities, and insufficient economic engagement have allowed China to consolidate influence across the region.
Cooper explains that for decades, the United States relied heavily on military presence while underinvesting in economic integration and institutional leadership. Although security alliances remained strong, economic initiatives lacked coherence and durability.
Asia After America and strategic imbalance
According to Cooper, the Asia After America dynamic emerged as Washington withdrew from regional trade agreements and failed to offer credible economic alternatives. Meanwhile, China expanded its influence through trade, infrastructure investment, and diplomatic outreach.
Moreover, Beijing’s sustained regional engagement contrasted with U.S. policy volatility. Frequent shifts in strategic messaging created uncertainty among partners. As a result, many Asian states diversified their relationships while deepening economic ties with China.
Restoring credibility and regional influence
The article argues that the United States can still recover strategic ground, but doing so requires a recalibrated approach. Military deterrence alone is insufficient. Economic leadership, sustained diplomatic engagement, and institutional commitment are essential to long-term influence.
Ultimately, Cooper suggests that Asia After America is not inevitable. However, reversing the trend depends on consistent policy execution and renewed strategic investment across economic and political domains.+
Reference
Cooper, Z. (2026). Asia after America: How U.S. strategy failed—and ceded the advantage to China. Foreign Affairs, 105(2). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/